Undervisningsbeskrivelse
Stamoplysninger til brug ved prøver til gymnasiale uddannelser
|
Termin(er)
|
2024/25
|
|
Institution
|
Esbjerg Gymnasium
|
|
Fag og niveau
|
Filosofi -
|
|
Lærer(e)
|
Jacob Lange
|
|
Hold
|
2024 IB/TOK1 (IB1 TOK1)
|
Oversigt over gennemførte undervisningsforløb
Beskrivelse af de enkelte undervisningsforløb (1 skema for hvert forløb)
|
Titel
1
|
The core: Knowledge and the knower
- Pages 40 - 60 from "Theory of Knowledge" (4. edition, Hodder Education)
- TED talks: 1) David Eagleman, 2) Beau Lotto, 3) Anil Seth
|
|
Indhold
|
Kernestof:
|
|
Omfang
|
Estimeret:
Ikke angivet
Dækker over:
2 moduler
|
|
Særlige fokuspunkter
|
|
|
Væsentligste arbejdsformer
|
|
|
Titel
2
|
AOK: The arts
Area of Knowledge: The arts
1) What is art for? (youtube-video)
2) BQ2 Values: Art and the artist (powerpoint)
3) pages 425-428 in Hodder on the arts and methods and tools.
4) article:https://www.historytoday.com/miscellanies/dark-arts and you will work in small groups to 1) select an argument or a point of view (a citation could be a good idea) 2) Try to construct a counterclaim. Buffer article: https://theconversation.com/what-makes-some-art-so-bad-that-its-good-89737
5) The arts (the Hodder doc) pages 403-408 and 421-422
|
|
Indhold
|
Kernestof:
|
|
Omfang
|
Estimeret:
Ikke angivet
Dækker over:
5 moduler
|
|
Særlige fokuspunkter
|
|
|
Væsentligste arbejdsformer
|
|
|
Titel
6
|
AOK Natural Science
AOK Natural science:
- KQ "Perspectives": How has scientific progress shaped our worldview? 1) what is linear progression and what is meant by the statement that scientific theories can only be proven false? 2) Explaining Kuhns paradigm shifts and the historical example (geocentric vs. heliocentric) 3) The question of Kuhn and relativism (different ways of viewing the world).
- Application: Based on your understanding of the progress of science we now turn to the article "A thermometer is not liberal or conservative": Read the article and choose an example of question and answer; explain or discuss your example by using the concepts of linear progress or paradigm shifts.
- The document "What qualifies a method as scientific?" (About the characteristics: the first six and then the next nine. You chose one of the pseudo-scientific theories mentioned and EXPLAIN why it was an example of pseudo-science)
- Ethics and the knowledge question (KQ): Do ethical constraints help or hinder the production of useful scientific knowledge? In groups: find and explain an example of this online
- Experts and the KQ:Is science the most important form of knowledge? Read the article "Philip Pullman: "A story will help us make sense of anything" and consider the KQ: Make some notes regarding this.
|
|
Indhold
|
Kernestof:
|
|
Omfang
|
Estimeret:
Ikke angivet
Dækker over:
6 moduler
|
|
Særlige fokuspunkter
|
|
|
Væsentligste arbejdsformer
|
|
|
Titel
8
|
AOK History
History and spin: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/feb/01/rewriting-the-past-do-historical-movies-have-to-be-accurate: 1)Do filmmakers have a responsibility for historical accuracy? Or does that responsibility lie with the viewer?
2) Consider the question posed by the writer – “Does historical fiction alter our sense of reality?”
3)Finally, do even the inaccurate historical movies prompt interest and debate over events from the past, ultimately helping us to discover truths and produce useful knowledge? Who has responsibility for accurate knowledge – producers or users?
- History and values: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/using-art-talk-about-holocaust-evidence-room-180973201/
1) How can the power of the arts be used to understand a historical event – by which we mean both the Holocaust itself, and one of the most famous legal cases that has ever occurred?
2) The article brings up the issue of evidence. Which requires stronger evidence: knowledge claims made in history, or those that are made in law?
3) What role does art play in the development of our ethical awareness? What role does the AOK history play in the development of our ethical awareness?
- TO BE CONTINUED: "How and why does history get rewritten" (a TOK document written by Michael Dunn) and the questions of evidence, objectiveness, purpose, paradigms, method and outlook in the AOK history
|
|
Indhold
|
Kernestof:
|
|
Omfang
|
Estimeret:
Ikke angivet
Dækker over:
4 moduler
|
|
Særlige fokuspunkter
|
|
|
Væsentligste arbejdsformer
|
|
{
"S": "/lectio/181/stamdata/stamdata_edit_student.aspx?id=666\u0026prevurl=studieplan%2fuvb_hold_off.aspx%3fholdid%3d65399325119",
"T": "/lectio/181/stamdata/stamdata_edit_teacher.aspx?teacherid=666\u0026prevurl=studieplan%2fuvb_hold_off.aspx%3fholdid%3d65399325119",
"H": "/lectio/181/stamdata/stamdata_edit_hold.aspx?id=666\u0026prevurl=studieplan%2fuvb_hold_off.aspx%3fholdid%3d65399325119"
}